Penn State
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
73  Tori Perri JR 19:54
75  Rebekka Simko JR 19:55
115  Brooklyne Ridder SR 20:05
250  Natalie Bower SR 20:29
271  Leigha Anderson SO 20:32
310  Katie Rodden SO 20:37
316  Emily Giannotti JR 20:38
438  Tori Gerlach FR 20:52
453  Abbie Benson SO 20:53
486  Marta Klebe JR 20:57
542  Anna Boyert FR 21:01
978  Gabrielle Cocco JR 21:32
1,093  Rachel Casciano SO 21:40
1,150  Kerrin Jennings SO 21:44
1,276  Kalyn Fisher JR 21:52
2,051  Lauren Mills SO 22:42
National Rank #15 of 339
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #2 of 38
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 99.5%
Most Likely Finish 15th at Nationals


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 2.5%
Top 10 at Nationals 15.8%
Top 20 at Nationals 67.1%


Regional Champion 27.1%
Top 5 in Regional 100.0%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Tori Perri Rebekka Simko Brooklyne Ridder Natalie Bower Leigha Anderson Katie Rodden Emily Giannotti Tori Gerlach Abbie Benson Marta Klebe Anna Boyert
Greater Louisville Classic (Blue) 09/29 1166 20:57 21:02
Greater Louisville Classic (Gold) 09/29 597 20:06 20:02 20:10 20:33 20:36 20:59 20:39 20:52 20:53
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/12 545 20:14 19:53 20:12 20:21 20:31 20:48 20:24
Big Ten Championships 10/28 538 20:07 19:49 20:14 20:24 20:27 20:32 20:27 21:22 20:54
Mid-Atlantic Region Championships 11/09 461 19:45 19:57 19:47 20:49 20:27 20:36 20:29
NCAA Championship 11/17 479 19:41 19:55 19:58 20:28 20:40 20:29 20:45





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 99.5% 17.4 446 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.6 1.1 1.7 1.7 2.7 3.0 4.1 4.6 4.8 5.5 5.4 5.7 5.2 5.3 4.7 5.3 4.9 4.4 4.1 3.8 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.6 2.5 1.6 1.8 1.4
Region Championship 100% 2.1 67 27.1 45.1 21.2 6.2 0.3 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Tori Perri 99.7% 74.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.2
Rebekka Simko 99.6% 75.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2
Brooklyne Ridder 99.5% 104.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Natalie Bower 99.5% 167.8
Leigha Anderson 99.5% 174.9
Katie Rodden 99.5% 188.1
Emily Giannotti 99.5% 190.1


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Tori Perri 6.0 3.3 6.0 8.8 10.2 11.2 10.6 9.3 7.8 7.5 5.9 4.4 3.8 2.9 2.7 1.8 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0
Rebekka Simko 6.0 3.6 5.9 7.9 10.2 10.7 11.2 9.5 7.9 6.7 6.2 4.4 3.4 3.0 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0
Brooklyne Ridder 10.6 0.3 1.0 1.9 2.8 4.4 5.7 7.8 7.2 7.4 7.4 7.2 7.0 7.0 5.7 5.6 5.0 4.2 3.2 3.0 1.8 1.6 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.3
Natalie Bower 21.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.7 3.0 3.2 3.9 4.2 5.5 6.3 6.5 7.7 7.5 7.8 6.4 5.5
Leigha Anderson 22.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.7 2.2 2.4 2.9 3.7 4.5 5.2 6.1 6.3 7.7 7.6 7.3 6.8
Katie Rodden 24.9 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 0.8 1.5 1.9 2.2 2.7 3.1 4.5 4.0 5.7 7.4 7.4 7.1
Emily Giannotti 25.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.2 1.7 1.9 2.4 3.1 4.0 4.9 5.5 5.9 7.2 7.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 27.1% 100.0% 27.1 27.1 1
2 45.1% 100.0% 45.1 45.1 2
3 21.2% 100.0% 0.2 1.0 6.4 8.4 4.3 0.8 0.1 0.0 21.2 3
4 6.2% 97.4% 0.1 0.2 1.2 1.6 1.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.2 6.1 4
5 0.3% 17.6% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 5
6 0.0% 0.0 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
Total 100% 99.5% 27.1 45.1 0.2 1.1 6.6 9.6 5.9 1.8 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 72.2 27.4




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Duke 100.0% 1.0 1.0
Weber State 99.6% 1.0 1.0
Minnesota 98.0% 2.0 2.0
New Mexico 98.0% 1.0 1.0
Connecticut 97.5% 1.0 1.0
Michigan State 97.3% 1.0 1.0
Notre Dame 95.3% 1.0 1.0
Vanderbilt 87.8% 2.0 1.8
Toledo 71.9% 1.0 0.7
Boston College 68.1% 1.0 0.7
North Carolina St. 53.9% 1.0 0.5
UCLA 39.1% 1.0 0.4
San Francisco 27.7% 1.0 0.3
Yale 24.0% 1.0 0.2
Princeton 14.9% 1.0 0.1
Wisconsin 12.8% 3.0 0.4
Kentucky 11.2% 1.0 0.1
Georgia 10.8% 2.0 0.2
Northwestern 7.9% 2.0 0.2
Dartmouth 7.5% 1.0 0.1
Mississippi 5.0% 1.0 0.1
Syracuse 3.7% 1.0 0.0
North Carolina 2.9% 1.0 0.0
BYU 2.8% 2.0 0.1
Harvard 2.0% 1.0 0.0
Colorado St. 1.2% 2.0 0.0
Illinois 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Brown 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Ohio State 0.4% 2.0 0.0
Indiana 0.2% 2.0 0.0
Columbia 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Iowa 0.1% 2.0 0.0
Virginia 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Texas A&M 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Northern Arizona 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Cal Poly 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 13.8
Minimum 8.0
Maximum 22.0